NewJeans’ fandom has sparked significant controversy after some fans called for government intervention in the treatment of member Danielle, who was recently removed from the group. In a move that has drawn widespread criticism, certain fans urged others to direct messages to South Korean President Lee Jae-myung and the Blue House, demanding action against what they perceive as unfair treatment by the management company HYBE.
The situation escalated after fans launched a petition that suggested contacting government officials regarding the contract disputes involving the group. Online discussions highlighted that many were perplexed by the strategy, questioning why fans would seek involvement from state leaders in matters typically confined to the entertainment industry.
Korean netizens reacted sharply, with comments reflecting disbelief and criticism. One user remarked, “The president is busy. Why would you ask the government about entertainment issues?” Others pointed out that idol contract issues and internal decisions made by companies like HYBE should not be a concern for the government. The backlash included remarks such as, “Just go away. Can’t we sue them for getting in the way of work?” This sentiment underscores a growing frustration among the public regarding the fans’ perceived overreach.
The controversy comes at a time when NewJeans is gaining popularity in the K-pop scene. However, this incident may have lasting effects on their public image. Critics argue that such public demonstrations can harm the group rather than assist it, potentially alienating fans and the general public alike.
The timeline for the protest was set from December 31, 2025 to January 6, 2026, with fans organizing various means of communication to raise awareness about their grievances against Bang Si Hyuk, the founder of HYBE. The fans, known as “Bunnies,” expressed their frustrations through social media, calling for solidarity among supporters in their efforts to influence the situation.
In the wake of this incident, the implications for both NewJeans and HYBE remain uncertain. The group’s management has yet to issue a formal response to the petition. Meanwhile, the public continues to debate the appropriateness of fans seeking governmental involvement in what many consider to be a private industry matter.
As the situation unfolds, it is clear that the fans’ actions have ignited a conversation about the boundaries between fandom and institutional authority in the K-pop industry, raising questions about the future dynamics between idols, their management, and their supporters.
