UPDATE: Megyn Kelly is under fire after controversial remarks on her SiriusXM show regarding Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minors. During her broadcast earlier this week, Kelly argued that Epstein should not be labeled a “pedophile,” suggesting he simply preferred “very young teen types,” specifically 15-year-old girls.
Kelly claimed that an unnamed source “very, very close to the case” informed her that Epstein “liked the barely legal type” rather than prepubescent children. “He liked 15-year-old girls,” she stated, calling it “disgusting,” but insisted there is a significant difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old. This distinction, she argued, raises questions about the accuracy of the widely used “pedophile” label.
The backlash was swift and intense. Critics, including host Josh Johnson from “The Daily Show,” expressed disbelief at Kelly’s comments. During a segment aired on October 25, 2023, Johnson reacted sharply, saying, “How the hell was Megyn Kelly ever an attorney?” He dismissed her argument as a form of “diet pedophilia,” emphasizing that there is never a valid reason to discuss such differences.
Social media platforms exploded with criticism, as many accused Kelly of minimizing sexual abuse by framing Epstein’s actions in a less severe light. Advocates for survivors have condemned her remarks as harmful, arguing that Epstein’s decades-long pattern of abuse involved minors who were legally incapable of consent, regardless of age.
Kelly’s comments also cast doubt on statements from former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi, who claimed Epstein possessed thousands of graphic videos involving minors. Kelly told her audience that she once believed Epstein was “an actual pedophile,” but now questions Bondi’s reporting on the case.
This incident has ignited a broader discussion about the language used to describe sexual abuse and its implications for survivors. Advocates emphasize the importance of recognizing the severity of all forms of exploitation, regardless of the victim’s age.
As the controversy unfolds, Kelly has not issued any further statements addressing the backlash. The impact of her remarks continues to resonate, prompting discussions about accountability and the need for sensitivity when discussing such critical issues.
Stay tuned for more updates as this story develops.
