UPDATE: David French, a prominent opinion writer for The New York Times, has voiced significant concerns regarding the recent surge in Christian sentiment in America following the tragic murder of Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA.
In an opinion piece titled, “Something Is Stirring in Christian America, and It’s Making Me Nervous,” French reflects on the national conversation that Kirk’s death has sparked, leading to a wave of Americans returning to church and embracing their faith. French’s unease comes at a time when many Christians are witnessing what they believe could be the beginnings of a much-needed national revival.
French states, “As a Christian who has long lamented the decline of church attendance in the United States, I should be very happy about all these developments.” However, he expresses worry that some believers may be too eager to embrace emotions over truth, warning against a so-called “sin of empathy.”
French highlights a recent memorial service for Kirk, where Stephen Miller, White House Deputy Chief of Staff, made headlines by vowing to combat what he termed “leftist terrorism.” Despite the service’s religious overtones, which included public proclamations of faith by federal officials, French criticizes the fervor with which some Christians are approaching these developments.
“We do not yet know whether this is genuine,” French cautions, raising questions about the authenticity of this revival.
The reactions to French’s opinion have been immediate and vocal. William Wolfe, Executive Director of Center for Baptist Leadership, tweeted, “David French is nervous. Good,” implying that French’s concerns may reflect a deeper issue within the evangelical community.
Megan Basham, a reporter with the Daily Wire, further amplified the discussion, stating, “When demons might say the same thing, maybe the problem is you…” This pointed commentary has resonated with many, sparking debates about the nature of this revival.
As the conversation continues to unfold, many are left pondering the potential implications of this renewed Christian enthusiasm. Will it lead to a collective repentance for national sins, such as abortion and sexual immorality? Or will it be seen as a temporary emotional response?
The urgency of this moment cannot be overstated. As American society grapples with complex issues, the evolving landscape of faith and politics is one that demands attention. The implications of French’s concerns and the responses from conservative commentators signal a critical juncture for the future of Christian influence in America.
As this story develops, observers will be watching closely to see whether this wave of spirituality translates into lasting change or if it falters under scrutiny. The stakes are high, as millions of Americans engage in a dialogue that could reshape the nation’s moral and religious landscape.
