Philippines Supreme Court Rules Same-Sex Partners Can Co-Own Property

URGENT UPDATE: The Supreme Court of the Philippines has just announced a groundbreaking ruling for same-sex couples, confirming that they can be recognized as co-owners of property acquired during their relationship. This decision, delivered on February 5, 2025, is a significant step forward for LGBTQ+ rights in the country, particularly under the limitations of the current Family Code.

In a pivotal case, referenced as G.R. No. 267469, the Court held that same-sex partners living together may establish co-ownership of property, provided they can present evidence of actual financial contributions. This ruling applies Article 148 of the Family Code to same-sex couples, despite Philippine law currently recognizing marriage only between a man and a woman.

The case involved a dispute between former partners over a residential property that was registered in one partner’s name. After their separation, the other partner claimed she had contributed significantly to the purchase and renovation of the home. Initially, lower courts dismissed her complaint due to insufficient proof of contribution. However, the Supreme Court reversed these decisions, emphasizing that co-ownership must be based on actual contributions.

Writing for the Court, Associate Justice Jhosep Y. Lopez elaborated that co-ownership is established when financial contributions are documented. The Court found a signed acknowledgment by the registered owner, confirming that the former partner contributed approximately half of the acquisition and renovation costs, as valid evidence of co-ownership.

This ruling is crucial as it clarifies that while same-sex marriage remains unrecognized in the Philippines, property disputes involving same-sex cohabitants can be adjudicated based on established civil law principles. Public figures such as singer-actor Ice Seguerra and filmmaker Liza Diño have expressed their support for the ruling, highlighting its importance for the LGBTQ+ community.

The Supreme Court’s decision does not alter the legal definition of marriage but provides clear guidance for lower courts tackling ownership disputes. The ruling signals a shift in legal recognition for same-sex partnerships, emphasizing that contributions matter in determining property rights.

As the news spreads, many are eager to see how this ruling will impact future cases and the ongoing discourse surrounding LGBTQ+ rights in the Philippines. This landmark decision opens the door for more equitable treatment of same-sex couples and reinforces the importance of financial contributions in property ownership disputes.

Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story as reactions unfold and implications are discussed.